Hey @djenzar , i’m so sorry. Somehow Discourse ate your request. Now that we found it again. I’ve had a look. There are a couple open wishes regarding LFO.
LFO Modulation currently doesn’t allow for an offset, this means:
If the amount is set to 50 → The modulation will go from 0 to 50
If the amount is set to 10 → It will go from 0 to 10
This proposal suggest a modulation offset which would give you more control within the range that should be modulated. For example:
If the amount is set to 50 + the Offset is set to 50 → The modulation will go from 50 to 100.
Ideally it could be choosable if it’s a unipolar or bipolar behaviour.
What is the p…
Ability to configure the LFO retrigger behaviour
What is the problem?
There is no way to define LFO retrigger behaviour. This can lead to confusion about which part of an LFO cycle is expected when, for different instruments.
This can be particularly confusing when using an LFO to timestretch, but a sample is triggered on a step number that is not a multiple of the LFO period.
What do you want to achieve?
On the second Instrument Paramaters screen, choose whether each LFO retriggers at the be…
Currently there aren’t many envelope or lfo shapes available for automation.
This wish proposes to expand this functionality by adding wavetables as envelopes / lfos.
Background:
XAOC devices Zadar module has revolutionized the way users can use envelopes.
Their wavetable envelope system is absolutely brilliant and it could make for a welcome addition to the tracker.
Zadar has 256 wavetables of envelopes which can be looped to generate LFO style functions.
Each shape can be bent left or ri…
How similar is your wish to those. I’m just wondering if one of these covers your needs or if we need to rephrase this wish to take into account the differences between the existing wishes.
1 Like