What is the problem?
Can’t run effects into a single reverb without running them in series. Can we have a 3 parallel effects all running into the fourth effect.
What should this feature achieve?
Would allow the use of a reverb at the end of chain that would apply to all other effects.
Are there any workarounds?
Not that I’m aware
Any links to related discussions?
–
Any references to other products?
–
3 Likes
I would also love 1-to-3 parallel option.
This would run one effect into 3 parallel effects. Basically the opposite of what you’re asking 
Would that even make sense? lol Maybe it’s too early for thinking haha.
1 Like
I wonder if dual series could be a thing for polyend mess… I mean it can do dual parallel so why not dual series?
How about simply stated as all possible iterations of routing 4 effects also allowing for one dual parallel plus one dual series? That’s what, 15 options or so? parallel, series, dual p, dual s, 2s+2p, 2s>2p, 2p>2s, 1>3 p, 1>3 s, 1>2 p+1, 1>2 s+1, 3 p>1, 3 s>1, 2 p+1>1, 2 s+1>1… something like that?
2 Likes