Hello.
Apologies in advance if I’m way off the mark here, just trying to understand what’s going on really…
Is there an inherent technical / hardware limitation that prohibits the tracker from being able to zoom in close enough to a waveform to display individual samples in sample editor / sample playback mode?
Surely 0% zoom should display the entire waveform and 100% zoom should display individual samples.
Currently the deepest zoom level varies based on the length of the file in the wave table. Among other things this makes it impossible to manually find a zero crossing when adding or adjusting slices due to a lack of visual resolution.
Does this behavior define the capabilities of the zero crossing feature?
The zero crossing detection algorithm in firmware 1.8 has been described as having had it’s threshold adjusted, but a zero crossing event either exists or doesn’t exist so how can there be an adjustable “threshold” for detecting that?
I have a green cursor on parts of a waveform that are visually very far from a zero crossing. I also have a red cursor on parts of a waveform that are significantly closerr to zero
So how is all this working?
To be fair, I didn’t really mind the limited zoom functionality for the last couple years. I always accepted it as one of the quirks of the Tracker, but since the zero crossing feature was introduced it’s made me curious…