While it’s standard envelope behavior to be a positive voltage, there are additional possibilities in sound design when you can send a negative voltage from an envelope. For example, if you have a sound being processed with a band or high-pass filter and you want the envelope to reduce the frequency…

Hey @erik , it’s me again :laughing: .. I think the following wish already covers that? [image] Support for LFO Offsets Feature Requests LFO Modulation currently doesn’t allow for an offset, this means: If the amount is set to 50 → The modulation will g…

Unfortunately that isn’t quite the same. Most of this suggestion really centered around the benefit of having negative amounts for Envelopes. Using the example of the Filter Cutoff Envelope - right now the Envelope can only be applied additive, not subtractive from the Frequency of the Filter on the…

According to this though t’s supposed to be bipolar already though, thereby allowing negative amounts as well? [image] Support for LFO Offsets Wishlist Hi @smt , thanks for your wish, but this is how current implementation works. LFO is bipolar already and works exactly a…

I was assuming that using a negative amount for the LFO modulation would invert the LFO shape, basically. For example, if modulation with a positive amount featuring a Square Wave starts the waveform as High, then modulation with a negative amount would start the waveform as Low.

Ah that makes more sense now to me :heart: May i ask you to add that or expand on this in your original wish post? That would be greatly appreciated :blush:

@here Thanks for your wish. It’s now ready for voting :slight_smile:

100% on board for this feature request! inverted/negative modulation are almost standard in synthesis these days and in the past. the Tracker has my favorite workflow of any hardware device but the lack of essential synthesis features makes it very hard to create many styles of synth patches/sounds…

Negative amounts for Modulation sources

Feature Requests

Sandroid November 18, 2023, 12:01pm 3

Hey @erik , it’s me again ..

I think the following wish already covers that?

Let me know.